Uspto Patent Assignment Filing

Jump to Main Content

  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • IP Policy
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us Home
    • Events
    • Executive Biographies
    • Find by Subject A-Z
    • News & Updates
    • Organizational Offices
      • Back
      • Office of Policy and International Affairs
      • Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
      • Office of the Chief Communications Officer
      • Office of the Chief Financial Officer
      • Office of the Chief Information Officer
      • Office of the Commissioner for Patents
        • Back
        • Office of the Commissioner for Patents Home
        • Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Staff
        • Office of Patent Legal Administration
        • Office of Petitions
        • Office of the Deputy Commissioner for International Patent Cooperation
        • Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Administration
        • Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations
          • Back
          • Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Home
          • TC 1600 - Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
          • TC 1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
          • TC 2100 - Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security
          • TC 2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex communication, Video Distribution, and Security
          • TC 2600 - Communications
          • TC 2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
          • TC 2900 - Designs
          • TC 3600 - Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security and License & Review
          • TC 3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, Products
      • Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Office of the Under Secretary and Director
      • Patent Trial and Appeal Board
      • Public Advisory Committees
      • Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
    • Performance and Planning
    • USPTO Locations
    • Vendor Information
  • Learning and Resources

I’ll share my notion of the Best Practice for recordation of US patent assignments.  Please post comments below.

As a starting point to this discussion, I will remind the reader that if we receive a signed assignment and if we sit on it too long, we eventually come out on the wrong side of the 3-month period set forth in 35 USC § 261:

An interest that constitutes an assignment, grant or conveyance shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, without notice, unless it is recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office within three months from its date or prior to the date of such subsequent purchase or mortgage.

So we will take as our starting point that whatever else we do about recording an assignment or postponing the recording of an assignment, we ought to try extremely hard to avoid getting on the wrong side of this three-month period.  (There are similar statutory three-month periods for trademark assignments and copyright assignments.)

Old-timers (or at least, practitioners who were in practice prior to January 1, 2014) will recall the days when it was necessary to pay a government fee to record a patent assignment. In those old days, practitioners would go to great lengths to try to avoid paying two fees if there was a way to squeeze two recordations into a single recordation (so as to pay only one fee).  A practitioner having encountered a problem with an existing recordation filing would go to great lengths to try to salvage the filing so as to avoid having to pony up a second government fee.  If there were two inventors, each of whom was supposed to sign an assignment, and if the signed assignments showed up on different days, most folks would carefully save up the first one and postpone e-filing it until the second signed assignment arrived.  This way, the filer could bunch them together and e-file them all in the same package.

As I say, the overarching goal for most practitioners in those old days was to try as hard as possible to get away with paying only one government fee for multiple assignments.

But the US eliminated the fee on January 1, 2014.  So that is no longer a reason to drag our feet on e-filing a signed assignment if we have it in hand.

A first drawback to intentionally postponing recording a signed assignment is that one might inadvertently permit the three-month period to pass (which I will call a “recordation failure”). By this I mean that to avoid a recordation failure, one needs to aggressively docket the three-month period. The docket steps would be (a) receive the signed assignment from the client; (b) note the date of execution (which might not be the same as the date that we received the signed assignment from the client); (c) add three months to the date of execution to arrive at a drop-dead recordation date, and (d) docket the drop-dead date and one or two warning dates.

If there were a docket failure (failing to set the drop-dead date, or failing to blow whistles loudly enough toward the end of the three-month period) then this would lead to a recordation failure (failing to record the signed assignment within the three-month period set forth in 35 USC § 261).

In our office, we estimate that the internal cost to set and clear a docket is around $50.  So if we can simply do something and get it done, rather than dragging our feet on the task, we don’t need to docket to remember to do whatever it is.  And then we save $50.

So to emphasize the above point, if we record each signed assignment promptly after receiving it, this also avoids having to do the above-mentioned fuss of docketing the three-month period under 35 USC § 261. Once we record the signed assignment, we can stop worrying about setting and clearing dockets to remember to record the signed assignment.

The practitioner who makes a decision to postpone recording an assignment is creating a second risk.  Whenever we sit on a signed assignment without recording it, we create the risk of misplacing the signed assignment. What if the document falls behind a desk?  What if the breeze catches the document and it flies out the window?  What if the file server where we store the PDF document crashes?  What if the file server does not crash, but through some bad luck the PDF document gets stored in the wrong folder?

The USPTO’s assignment recordation system may thus be thought of as an offsite backup for signed assignments. Saying this a different way, the sooner the signed assignment is recorded, the sooner that one may stop worrying about the risk of misplacing it.

A nay-sayer might ask “yes but if I record each inventor’s assignment when it arrives, I will have to fill in the twenty or so fields of the EPAS system twice instead of once!”  The answer to this, of course, is that when we are recording the first assignment, we should save a template.  When the second assignment shows up, we can use the template to auto-populate nearly all of the fields of the EPAS system for that second recordation.

Do you think that what I have described is a Best Practice?  Please post your comment below.

 

Posted in Patents |
Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Uspto Patent Assignment Filing”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *